Development and Evaluation of a Faculty Teaching Boot Camp Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction Medical faculty often assume teaching responsibilities without formal training in teaching skills. The purpose of this study was to design, implement, and evaluate boot camp workshop training faculty in basic teaching competencies. We also describe the transition to a virtual format necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The workshop content was derived from a needs assessment survey and discussion with content experts. Four main content areas were identified: setting expectations, giving feedback, evaluating learners, and teaching in specific settings (outpatient clinics, inpatient wards, procedures/surgery, and small groups). The initial boot camp was a four-hour in-person event. The following year, the boot camp was offered via online videoconference. We used a pre-post survey to assess participant reaction and knowledge acquisition from session content. Results A total of 30 local faculty attended the 2020 in-person boot camp, while 105 faculty from across the state attended the 2021 online boot camp. Statistically significant increases in post-knowledge scores were identified for two sessions in the 2020 boot camp and four sessions in 2021. The participants rated both boot camps favorably with no significant difference between the in-person and online presentations for most ratings but were less satisfied with networking opportunities in the online boot camp. Discussion We describe an effective faculty development boot camp teaching core competencies for medical clinician-educators. We were able to leverage the online teleconferencing platform to deliver the content to a larger number of preceptors at distant sites without sacrificing outcomes of participant satisfaction and improvement in knowledge scores. The online model allowed busy clinicians to participate while multitasking. Comments also highlighted the importance of having an engaged moderator during the online event. Conclusions Many medical schools utilize preceptors in distant locations. We demonstrated the feasibility of reaching a much larger and geographically widespread group of clinical preceptors using a virtual format while still showing improvement in knowledge scores relating to workshop content. For future faculty development, we propose that hybrid models with both in-person and virtual components will be effective in meeting the needs of a geographically distributed faculty.

Virtual curriculum delivery in the COVID-19 era: the pediatric surgery boot camp v2.0.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of a virtual Pediatric Surgery Bootcamp curriculum on resource utilization, learner engagement, knowledge retention, and stakeholder satisfaction. METHODS: A virtual curriculum was developed around Pediatric Surgery Milestones. GlobalCastMD delivered pre-recorded and live content over a single 10-h day with a concluding social hour. Metrics of learner engagement, faculty interaction, knowledge retention, and satisfaction were collected and analyzed during and after the course. RESULTS: Of 56 PS residencies, 31 registered (55.4%; 8/8 Canadian and 23/48 US; p = 0.006), including 42 learners overall. The virtual BC budget was $15,500 (USD), 54% of the anticipated in-person course. Pre- and post-tests were administered, revealing significant knowledge improvement (48.6% [286/589] vs 66.9% [89/133] p < 0.0002). Learner surveys (n = 14) suggested the virtual BC facilitated fellowship transition (85%) and strengthened peer-group camaraderie (69%), but in-person events were still favored (77%). Program Directors (PD) were surveyed, and respondents (n = 22) also favored in-person events (61%). PDs not registering their learners (n = 7) perceived insufficient value-added and concern for excessive participants. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual bootcamp format reduced overall expenses, interfered less with schedules, achieved more inclusive reach, and facilitated content archiving. Despite these advantages, learners and program directors still favored in-person education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Informing a Randomized Control Trial in Rural Populations: Adaptation of a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Over 34 million people in the United States have diabetes, with 1.5 million diagnosed every year. Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) is a crucial component of treatment to delay or prevent complications. Rural communities face many unique challenges in accessing DSMES, including geographic barriers and availability of DSMES programs that are culturally adapted to rural context. OBJECTIVE: Boot Camp Translation (BCT) is an established approach to community-based participatory research used to translate complex clinical and scientific information into concepts, messages, and materials that are understandable, meaningful, and relevant to community members and patients. This study aimed to utilize BCT to adapt an existing DSMES program for delivery in rural primary care for English- and Spanish-speaking people with diabetes. METHODS: The High Plains Research Network (HPRN) Community Advisory Council (C.A.C.) partnered with researchers at the University of Colorado and University of Utah to use BCT to aid in translating medical jargon and materials from an existing DSMES program, called "Diabetes One Day (D1D)." BCT consisted of 10 virtual meetings over a 6-month period among the C.A.C., which included 15 diverse community stakeholders. Both English-speaking and bilingual Spanish-English-speaking C.A.C. members were recruited to reflect the diversity of the rural communities in which the adapted program would be delivered. RESULTS: The BCT process guided adaptations to D1D for use in rural settings (R-D1D). R-D1D adaptations reflect both content and delivery to assure that the intervention is appropriate and likely to be accepted by rural English- and Spanish-speaking people with diabetes. Additionally, BCT informed the design of recruitment and program materials and identification of recruitment venues. During the BCT process, the importance of tailoring materials to reflect culture differences in English- and Spanish-speaking patients was identified. CONCLUSIONS: BCT was an effective strategy for academic researchers to partner with rural community members to adapt an existing DSMES intervention for delivery in rural areas to both English- and Spanish-speaking patients with diabetes. Through BCT, adaptations to recruitment materials and methods, program content and delivery, and supplemental materials were developed. The need to culturally adapt Spanish materials with input from stakeholders rather than simply translate materials into Spanish was highlighted. The importance of increasing awareness of the connection between diabetes and depression or diabetes distress, adaptations to include local foods, and the importance of the relationship between people with diabetes and their primary care practices were identified.

Student perception and assessment outcomes using a pilot condensed format ("boot camp") in a Fixed Prosthodontics course.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess student perception as well as course outcomes (final written examination grades) when using a pilot condensed format in an undergraduate Fixed Prosthodontics course, which was implemented as a response to the global pandemic of Covid-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The course was delivered in a condensed format, with a total of 28 direct contact hours in the Simulation Clinic within a 4 day period. Asynchronous remote learning was employed for the didactic portion of the course. Students completed surveys before and after the course, to assess their perception of the condensed format, and written examination grades were compared with previous years' grades. Data were entered in an Excel database (Microsoft Excel 2016) and analysed using a statistical analysis software program (IBM SPSS Statistics, v26; IBM Corp). The level of significance was set to α = 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, student perception of the condensed format was positive. At the beginning of the course, female students had less confidence in their skills compared to male students (p < .05). Written examination grades were significantly lower compared to previous years' grades (p = .04). CONCLUSION: The use of a condensed format can allow a course to be delivered in smaller student cohorts and provides the ability to reduce the total number of direct contact hours allotted to the course, creating space within the curriculum. Student perception of this format was generally positive. However, written examination scores were negatively impacted, indicating possible knowledge gaps resulting from the condensed course format. More studies are needed to assess the effect of the various curricular modifications that have been implemented due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Building students statistical skills using passion-driven statistics "boot camp" model

The COVID-19 pandemic has gifted us a pivot point, an opportunity, in which one can consider ways to do things differently than one has "always" done them. Traditionally, students view statistics as an obstacle to overcome, rather than an opportunity to pursue their own interests and passions. The Passion-Driven Statistics curriculum challenges this viewpoint by exposing students to a meaningful and powerful data analysis experience during a 3-day "boot camp" or as a short project over a few weeks. This chapter provides major student outcomes (e.g., an empirical poster presentation) with minor faculty investment (e.g., time, technology). The model can be quickly personalized to meet the needs of you and your students, which is especially important during moments of an unexpected pivot. In addition to face-to-face, the outcomes can be met in a fully online, remote, or hybrid environment, making this model suitable for use in a variety of contexts. The "boot camp" model could serve as a way for your student lab members to gain research experience, skill-building workshop for your psychology club students, or project for a content-based course. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Core surgical field camps: a new deanery-based model for enhancing advanced skills in core surgical trainees through simulation.

Hands-on wet lab simulation training is a vital part of modern surgical training. Since 2010, surgical 'boot camps' have been run by many UK deaneries to teach core surgical trainees basic entry level skills. Training in advanced skills often requires attendance at national fee-paying courses. In the Wessex Deanery, multiple, free of charge, core surgical 'field camps' were developed to provide more advanced level teaching in the particular specialty preference of each core surgical trainee. After the COVID-19 pandemic, national hands-on courses will be challenging to provide and deanery-based advanced skills training may be the way forward for craft-based specialties. The experiences over 2 years of delivering the Wessex core surgical field camps are shared, giving a guide and advice for other trainers on how to run a field camp.